Risk prediction
Estimate which patients may need earlier screening, follow-up, or additional review using information available at the decision point.
Risk prediction · diagnosis support · patient outcomes · resource planning
Healthcare data often comes in rows and columns: laboratory values, observations, diagnoses, utilization history, appointments, and operational measures. Machine learning can prioritize review, estimate risk, and help plan resources. The intended decision and the limits of the data must stay explicit.
Classification fits outcomes with categories. Examples include whether a donor returns or whether a sample is likely benign or malignant. Regression fits quantities such as length of stay or resource demand. A model score isn't a diagnosis. Clinical validity, workflow fit, calibration, subgroup performance, and safe escalation matter as much as headline accuracy.
Each row connects a business problem to its dataset profile, held-out benchmark results, and prepared Google Sheet. Dataset size provides context. It isn't a quality score. Compare results only when the tasks and metrics match.
| Dataset | Problem | Task | Rows | Features | Evidence | Carla |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood Transfusion Service Center | Donor return prediction | Binary classification | 748 | 4 | Benchmark | Try Blood Transfusion Service Center in Google Sheets |
| Breast W | Diagnostic classification | Binary classification | 699 | 9 | Benchmark | Try Breast W in Google Sheets |
| Diabetes | Health risk prediction | Binary classification | 768 | 8 | Benchmark | Try Diabetes in Google Sheets |
A worthwhile use case has an outcome you can define, examples of past outcomes, inputs available at prediction time, and a workflow that can act on the result.
Estimate which patients may need earlier screening, follow-up, or additional review using information available at the decision point.
Combine measured clinical attributes into a decision-support signal while keeping qualified professionals responsible for interpretation.
Estimate readmission, complications, response, or other outcomes to support proactive care planning and research.
Forecast appointments, bed demand, donor attendance, staffing, or inventory so operational teams can allocate capacity.
Detect shifts in measurements, populations, or process outcomes that may indicate a workflow or data-quality problem.
Start with fields that exist before the prediction is made. Remove identifiers unless they serve a defensible purpose, and watch for columns that reveal the outcome indirectly.
Carla’s benchmark pages use persisted held-out splits. Models train on one set of rows and run on another. This keeps comparisons reproducible across the browser and Python runners. It doesn't remove the differences between a public dataset and your process.
Use the benchmark to inspect task formulation, metrics, variability, and runtime. Then repeat the evaluation on your own historical data with a split that resembles future use.
Health information is highly sensitive. Use the minimum necessary variables. Apply access controls and retention rules. Keep identifiable records out of tools that aren't approved for the workflow.
Local execution can reduce data movement, but it doesn't make a clinical use compliant or safe by itself. Organizations still need a legal basis, security controls, validation, documentation, and accountable clinical oversight.
Before deployment, document the intended user, decision, target definition, acceptable errors, excluded uses, and a process for monitoring changes. Keep a manual path for unusual cases and for people affected by consequential decisions.
Run a model for rows and columns directly on your data in Google Sheets. Carla runs it locally in your browser. Your spreadsheet doesn't need to go to a model server.
Choose a repeated decision with a measurable historical outcome, data available before the decision, and a person who can act on the prediction. Begin with a narrow classification or regression question rather than trying to automate an entire process.
No. The linked dataset pages explain the target and benchmark, and Carla lets you run a tabular foundation model from Google Sheets. Production decisions still require appropriate domain, data, and governance expertise.
No. A benchmark measures a model on a specific dataset and evaluation design. Your population, definitions, data quality, time period, and workflow can produce materially different results.