Skip to main content
CARLA HQ
Meteorology & Climate Operations & Workforce Analytics use casesNACE M72Time Series ForecastingHourly Cadence24 Steps HorizonTarget: target_0fev / AutoGluon ↗

Jena Climate & Weather Telemetry

High-resolution meteorology benchmark spanning 8,784 hourly observations across 21 atmospheric telemetry variables from a single sensor station. Designed for day-ahead 24-hour multivariate weather forecasting to support renewable energy dispatch and environmental operations.

✨ Try in CarlaInstall Chrome Extension ↗100% In-Browser WebGPU • Zero Cloud Upload
8,784Records (Rows)
1Time Series
HourlySampling Cadence
24 HoursForecast Horizon (20 Windows)
Strong diurnal 24-hour cycle driven by solar irradiance, coupled with synoptic weather fronts (3 to 7-day cyclical oscillations) and macro annual seasonality.Dominant Seasonality
41 Methodsfev Leaderboard (SQL)
BUSINESS CONTEXT & OBJECTIVEEnvironmental Monitoring & Meteorology (M72)

Business Objective: Jena Climate & Weather Telemetry

01Business Context

Grid operators, municipal utilities, and agritech platforms require precise 24-hour day-ahead atmospheric forecasts to schedule wind and solar generation dispatch, manage district heating thermal inertia, and plan agricultural spraying windows.

02Analytical Objective

Forecast 21 interdependent atmospheric and thermodynamic state variables over an hourly 24-step horizon (H=24) using historical multi-sensor telemetry.

03Economic & Decision Impact

Accurate day-ahead atmospheric forecasting minimizes costly ancillary grid reserve activations and imbalance penalties from wind/solar ramping errors. Under-forecasting temperature or wind triggers thermal overload or unhedged peak-load spot purchases, while over-forecasting yields curtailed renewable capacity and stranded reserve commitments.

04Temporal Dynamics & Covariate Information Flow

Solar zenith angle and clear-sky solar radiation profiles serve as deterministic calendar drivers; dynamic barometric pressure gradients and wind vector shifts govern incoming frontal transitions.

ML Benchmark Narrative

Classical univariate statistical baselines (AutoARIMA, ETS) capture diurnal oscillations for thermodynamic targets like temperature but fail on complex non-linear wind dynamics and cross-variable physical relationships. Gradient boosted decision trees (LightGBM lag models) perform robustly with cross-lagged feature engineering across atmospheric density and pressure, while zero-shot time series foundation models (Mistral's Timestral, MOIRAI, TimesFM) excel at capturing multivariate cross-attentions and zero-shot out-of-sample weather shifts without task-specific retraining.

Source Origin:Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Creator:Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany (2020)
License:CC-BY-4.0
FEATURE SPECIFICATION & DATA DICTIONARY

Target & Feature Column Definitions

Exhaustive business definitions, measurement units, roles, and target variables across all 23 columns.

INFORMATION AVAILABILITY & TEMPORAL PROTOCOL

Known Future Covariates vs. Historically Observed Covariates

Multi-step forecasting models must respect the arrow of time and real-world information availability. FEV benchmarks and Carla strictly distinguish between features known across the forward prediction window versus realizations available only up to the forecast origin.

FUTURE KNOWN COVARIATESLegitimately available at test time (steps t+1 to t+H)

Scheduled promotions (such as Rossmann's Promo), calendar events (school/state holidays), and operational forecasts (such as Nord Pool's day-ahead grid load and wind power forecasts). These are deterministic or published before market clearing, allowing foundation models to legitimately condition on them across future steps.

HISTORICALLY OBSERVED COVARIATESStrictly restricted to history (time ≤ t)

Stochastic operational observations (such as Rossmann's actual customer footfall Customers, Rohlik's actual precipitation and snowfall, or sudden warehouse shutdowns). Because these are only realized in real-time, future values must never enter a prediction to prevent lookahead target leakage.

Observed Dataset Dynamics: Solar zenith angle and clear-sky solar radiation profiles serve as deterministic calendar drivers; dynamic barometric pressure gradients and wind vector shifts govern incoming frontal transitions.
ColVariable / Feature NameRoleTypeUnit / ScaleDescription & Business Meaning
Ctarget_0Barometric PressureTARGETNUMmbar
Atmospheric surface pressure recorded at station elevation
Dtarget_1Air TemperatureTARGETNUMdeg C
Ambient dry-bulb air temperature measured at 2 meters elevation
Etarget_10Air DensityTARGETNUMg/m**3
Atmospheric air density computed from pressure, temperature, and moisture content
Ftarget_11Wind SpeedTARGETNUMm/s
Mean horizontal wind speed measured by anemometer at mast height
Gtarget_12Maximum Wind SpeedTARGETNUMm/s
Peak wind gust velocity observed during the hourly recording interval
Htarget_13Wind DirectionTARGETNUMdeg
Compass azimuth direction from which the wind is blowing
Itarget_14PrecipitationTARGETNUMmm
Total liquid precipitation accumulated over the hourly interval
Jtarget_15Rain DurationTARGETNUMs
Cumulative duration of rainfall events observed within the hour
Ktarget_16Shortwave Solar RadiationTARGETNUMW/m**2
Downwelling shortwave solar irradiance incident on a horizontal surface
Ltarget_17Photosynthetically Active RadiationTARGETNUMumol/m**2/s
Incident photon flux density available for photosynthesis (400-700 nm spectral band)
Mtarget_18Max Photosynthetically Active RadiationTARGETNUMumol/m**2/s
Peak instantaneous photosynthetically active radiation recorded during the hour
Ntarget_19Logger Internal TemperatureTARGETNUMdeg C
Internal operating temperature of the telemetry data acquisition system
Otarget_2Potential TemperatureTARGETNUMK
Potential temperature adjusted adiabatically to a reference pressure of 1000 mbar
Ptarget_20CO2 ConcentrationTARGETNUMppm
Atmospheric mole fraction of carbon dioxide measured at the mast intake
Qtarget_3Dew Point TemperatureTARGETNUMdeg C
Temperature to which air must be cooled to become saturated with water vapor
Rtarget_4Relative HumidityTARGETNUM%
Ratio of current absolute vapor pressure to saturation vapor pressure
Starget_5Saturation Vapor PressureTARGETNUMmbar
Maximum vapor pressure possible at prevailing ambient air temperature
Ttarget_6Vapor PressureTARGETNUMmbar
Partial pressure exerted by water vapor in the atmosphere
Utarget_7Vapor Pressure DeficitTARGETNUMmbar
Difference between saturation vapor pressure and actual vapor pressure
Vtarget_8Specific HumidityTARGETNUMg/kg
Mass ratio of water vapor to total moist air mass
Wtarget_9Water Vapor ConcentrationTARGETNUMmmol/mol
Molar concentration of water vapor molecules per mole of moist air
AidStation IDSERIES IDCAT—
Unique identifier for the recording weather station entity
BtimestampTimestampTIMETIME—
ISO 8601 recording time of atmospheric observation at hourly resolution
DATASET PREVIEW

Interactive Data Table

Explore rows, feature values, and target labels for Jena Climate & Weather Telemetry.

Loading dataset...
GLOBAL BENCHMARK PROVENANCE (FEV-BENCH)

Foundation Models vs Traditional ML & Baselines (41 Methods)

Empirical evaluation directly from the AutoGluon fev benchmark suite. Global aggregate ranking: The win rates and skill scores below represent cross-dataset performance across all 100 standardized tasks in fev-bench, rather than results isolated to Jena Climate & Weather Telemetry.

Benchmark Provenance & Latency Measurement:
100-Task Global Aggregation:The rankings evaluate zero-shot foundation models across 100 heterogeneous benchmark tasks in fev-bench, measuring aggregate generalization across diverse frequencies and prediction horizons.
FEV Python vs. In-Browser WebGPU Timing:The "FEV Latency" column reports server-side Python execution times from the official AutoGluon FEV benchmark. Independently, Carla measures and reports true client-side WebGPU execution inside Google Sheets (1.0s on this dataset) with zero server reliance.
#1 Global Ranked Model?Timestral-209M achieves the highest aggregate win rate (87.7%) across all 100 tasks in fev-bench.
Timestral-209M87.7% Win Rate • 0.51s latency
Evaluated Methods?41 models spanning open-weight foundation models, closed APIs, deep neural architectures, and statistical baselines.
41 MethodsMistral AI, Google, AWS, Salesforce, Prior Labs
Primary Evaluation Metric?Scaled Quantile Loss (SQL) penalizes both point prediction errors and quantile miscalibration across 9 probabilistic levels (p10 to p90).
SQL & MASEProbabilistic calibration
Independent Browser WebGPU?Carla Engine benchmarks Timestral-123M 100% locally in-browser via WebGPU tensor kernels, distinct from FEV's server-side Python benchmarking environment.
1.0s / windowTimestral-123M (Carla Engine) • Zero server upload
RankMethod / ModelFamilyOrganization
SQL Win Rate?Average win rate (%) against all competing models across the benchmark tasks under Scaled Quantile Loss.
SQL Skill?Normalized skill score relative to the Seasonal Naive baseline (0% = baseline, higher is better).
MASE Win Rate?Average win rate (%) under Mean Absolute Scaled Error.
FEV Latency?FEV benchmark reference latency measured in server Python (median seconds per 100 series). Independent in-browser WebGPU execution for Carla is reported in the telemetry card above.
Link
#1Timestral-209MFoundation ModelMistral AI87.7%+50.4%86.1%0.51sRepo ↗
#2Timestral-123M (Carla Engine)Foundation ModelMistral AI86.9%+50.2%85.0%0.32sPython (FEV)Repo ↗
#3TimeRSIClosed-Source APIGaTech & SamayLabs84.8%+51.2%83.8%2512sRepo ↗
#4t0-gammaFoundation ModelThe Forecasting Company84.4%+49.4%81.8%4.38sRepo ↗
#5Timestral-28MFoundation ModelMistral AI79.2%+48.4%77.0%0.11sRepo ↗
#6timesfm-3Foundation ModelGoogle78.6%+49.0%77.0%3.41sRepo ↗
#7ChakraTSBaselineCommunity78.2%+48.1%79.5%14.22sRepo ↗
#8Lingjiang2.0BaselineCommunity73.9%+47.0%71.3%8.89sRepo ↗
#9Chronos-2Foundation ModelAWS70.4%+47.3%68.4%0.84sRepo ↗
#10timeh2o-v1-tinyFoundation ModelH2O.ai69.9%+45.5%67.1%0.19sRepo ↗
#11Timestral-5MFoundation ModelMistral AI69.0%+46.2%67.7%40msRepo ↗
#12Toto-2.0-2.5BBaselineCommunity67.5%+44.4%65.7%5.58sRepo ↗
#13t0-betaFoundation ModelThe Forecasting Company67.4%+46.6%64.5%2.29sRepo ↗
#14Toto-2.0-1BBaselineCommunity66.4%+44.4%65.6%2.48sRepo ↗
#15TiRex-2Foundation ModelNX-AI65.8%+45.5%63.4%0.27sRepo ↗
#16Toto-2.0-313mBaselineCommunity65.1%+44.2%63.5%1.06sRepo ↗
#17TiRexFoundation ModelNX-AI58.1%+42.6%54.2%0.24sRepo ↗
#18Toto-2.0-22mBaselineCommunity57.7%+42.9%56.0%0.25sRepo ↗
#19TimesFM-2.5BaselineCommunity54.6%+42.2%53.5%1.87sRepo ↗
#20TabPFN-TS-3Foundation ModelPrior Labs52.4%+43.1%51.3%235sRepo ↗
#21TS-ICLFoundation ModelEDF-Lab51.2%+43.1%49.8%2.49sRepo ↗
#22FlowStateFoundation ModelIBM49.3%+39.9%49.9%2.29sRepo ↗
#23citras-fmFoundation ModelHitachi48.8%+41.2%46.9%0.60sRepo ↗
#24Toto-1.0BaselineCommunity47.5%+40.8%45.9%22.35sRepo ↗
#25TabPFN-TSFoundation ModelPrior Labs47.3%+41.5%45.4%109sRepo ↗
#26Toto-2.0-4mBaselineCommunity46.2%+40.7%43.6%0.20sRepo ↗
#27Moirai-2.0BaselineCommunity41.9%+39.3%40.5%0.35sRepo ↗
#28Chronos-BoltFoundation ModelAWS41.4%+38.9%39.3%0.26sRepo ↗
#29TFTDeep Learning—31.7%+32.2%29.2%829sRepo ↗
#30Stat. EnsembleBaselineCommunity27.5%+20.7%30.6%147sRepo ↗
#31Sundial-BaseFoundation ModelTsinghua University27.4%+33.4%33.6%8.01sRepo ↗
#32PatchTSTDeep Learning—26.8%+30.1%25.2%664sRepo ↗
#33DeepARDeep Learning—26.1%+29.1%23.6%1113sRepo ↗
#34AutoARIMAStatistical Baseline—23.3%+21.3%21.5%20.14sRepo ↗
#35AutoETSStatistical Baseline—20.3%-26.8%22.5%3.48sRepo ↗
#36CatBoostTree Ensemble—19.2%+23.0%35.1%29.48sRepo ↗
#37LightGBMTree Ensemble—17.8%+21.0%33.2%3.03sRepo ↗
#38AutoThetaStatistical Baseline—15.6%+5.5%19.8%3.28sRepo ↗
#39Seasonal NaiveBaselineCommunity10.4%0.0%11.9%0.48sRepo ↗
#40NaiveStatistical Baseline—6.7%-45.4%11.0%0.47sRepo ↗
#41DriftStatistical Baseline—6.1%-45.8%10.0%0.45sRepo ↗
STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTIONS

Variable Schema & Summary Distributions

Observed numerical ranges, category cardinalities, missing rates, and sample values across 8,784 rows.

ColVariable NameTypeMissingDistinctSummary Stats / DistributionSample Values
Ctarget_0TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)6,988[955.739990234375, 1020.038330078125] μ=990.0 σ=9.21008.71197509765621008.3566894531251008.3333129882812
Dtarget_1TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)6,797[-6.176666736602783, 34.28666687011719] μ=10.8 σ=7.50.5780000090599060.14166666567325592-0.15333333611488342
Etarget_10TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)8,305[1108.8983154296875, 1318.2733154296875] μ=1210.9 σ=36.41281.05798339843751282.6933593751284.068359375
Ftarget_11TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)2,848[-1664.9066162109375, 12.573333740234375] μ=2.0 σ=17.90.73199999332427980.78166669607162480.5099999904632568
Gtarget_12TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)3,763[0.44333332777023315, 19.198333740234375] μ=3.6 σ=2.31.36000001430511471.35333335399627691.2300000190734863
Htarget_13TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)6,857[4.771666526794434, 353.8666687011719] μ=176.8 σ=65.9208.83999633789062177.8000030517578169.3633270263672
Itarget_14TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)58[0, 3.700000047683716] μ=0.0 σ=0.1000
Jtarget_15TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)308[0, 600] μ=25.9 σ=99.5000
Ktarget_16TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)4,742[0, 928.3683471679688] μ=131.4 σ=210.1000
Ltarget_17TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)4,839[0, 1823.943359375] μ=259.9 σ=412.2000
Mtarget_18TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)4,874[-5947.46142578125, 2304.921630859375] μ=308.7 σ=509.7000
Ntarget_19TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)6,837[6.953333377838135, 48.974998474121094] μ=21.5 σ=7.811.6140003204345712.06333351135253912.008333206176758
Otarget_2TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)6,847[266.4966735839844, 308.7466735839844] μ=284.8 σ=7.6273.0580139160156272.6499938964844272.3599853515625
Ptarget_20TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)3,569[-9999, 522.066650390625] μ=417.8 σ=306.3429.17999267578125432.04998779296875434.01666259765625
Qtarget_3TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)6,396[-13.141666412353516, 20.06999969482422] μ=5.4 σ=6.0-1.4780000448226929-1.6616666316986084-1.7999999523162842
Rtarget_4TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)5,776[21.899999618530273, 100] μ=72.5 σ=19.286.019996643066487.599998474121188.58333587646484
Starget_5TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)6,296[3.8450000286102295, 54.11833190917969] μ=14.5 σ=7.66.3699998855590826.1700000762939456.038333415985107
Ttarget_6TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)5,360[2.2149999141693115, 23.523332595825195] μ=9.7 σ=4.05.4780001640319825.405000209808355.349999904632568
Utarget_7TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)4,775[0, 40.35499954223633] μ=4.8 σ=5.50.88999998569488530.76499998569488530.6916666626930237
Vtarget_8TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)4,313[1.375, 14.930000305175781] μ=6.1 σ=2.63.3859999179840093.33833336830139163.306666612625122
Wtarget_9TARGETNUM1 (0.01%)5,364[2.2116665840148926, 23.786666870117188] μ=9.8 σ=4.15.4320001602172855.3633332252502445.304999828338623
AidCAT01—item_0item_0item_0
BtimestampCAT08,784—2020-01-01T00:00:002020-01-01T01:00:002020-01-01T02:00:00
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions: Jena Climate & Weather Telemetry

Common questions regarding the Jena Climate & Weather Telemetry dataset, machine learning task formulations, and in-browser tabular inference.

What is the forecasting horizon for Jena Climate & Weather Telemetry?

The standardized benchmark evaluates a 24-hour horizon (H=24) at hourly cadence, mapping directly to day-ahead utility dispatch and meteorological operations.

Can I run zero-server forecasts on this dataset in Google Sheets?

Yes, Carla enables zero-server in-context time series forecasting directly in spreadsheets using Mistral's Timestral foundation model.

Which models perform best on Jena Climate & Weather Telemetry?

Zero-shot foundation models like Mistral's Timestral and MOIRAI alongside tuned multivariate LightGBM models deliver top accuracy by capturing complex thermodynamic and diurnal cross-correlations.

LIVE EVALUATION IN GOOGLE SHEETS

Forecast with Carla: Jena Climate & Weather Telemetry

Open the pre-loaded Google Sheet and let Carla generate multi-step probabilistic forecasts using Mistral's Timestral directly inside your browser with zero server uploads.

Step 1

Launch Carla

Click once to open the spreadsheet and Carla side panel together.

Step 2

Review the Setup

Carla auto-detects the target sequence, frequency cadence, and temporal covariates.

Step 3

Forecast & Calibrate

Generate multi-step quantile forecasts with zero server uploads.

Provenance & Attribution

Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry Weather Station Dataset, Jena, Germany (2020).

License: Open AccessData Source: autogluon/fev_datasetsOriginal Source: https://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/wetter/